When the CEO, CTO and HR all contribute to a JD, you get a Frankenstein job description that asks for 15 years of experience in a 10-year-old technology, lists 30 required skills, and somehow manages to say nothing about what the person will actually do.
Fix: One person owns the JD. Usually the hiring manager. It should answer three questions: What problem are we hiring to solve? What does the first 90 days look like? What are the 3 non-negotiable skills? Everything else is a nice-to-have.
We had a candidate withdraw from a process last month after being told there would be 6 interview rounds. They had 2 other offers in hand. They took the job that made a decision in a week.
Fix: 3 rounds maximum for most roles. 4 for very senior hires. Every round should have a clear objective and should be additive — not repetitive. If you're not sure why a round exists, remove it.
The candidate crushes the interview. Everyone in the debrief says they want to hire. Then nothing happens for 2 weeks because the decision-maker is traveling. By the time you come back with an offer, the candidate has accepted somewhere else.
Fix: Set expectations explicitly. After the final round, tell the candidate: 'We will give you a decision within 5 business days.' Then actually do it. Urgency is a signal of respect.
Offering 15% above current CTC to someone who's had multiple competing offers at 40% above is not a negotiation — it's an insult. We see this most often when founders anchor to what they paid 3 years ago, or when they're applying startup equity math without actually communicating the equity story.
Fix: Do the market research first. Know the range before you start the process. If you can't match market, be transparent about it early — most candidates will still consider if the equity, mission and role are compelling enough.
No feedback loop: When a candidate declines your offer, find out why. It's free market intelligence. Most companies don't ask and keep making the same mistakes.
Hiring for culture fit alone: 'Culture fit' often means 'people who look and think like us.' This creates homogeneous teams that struggle with complex problems. Hire for culture add — people who share your values but bring different perspectives.
Not selling the role: The interview process runs both ways. The best candidates have options. They're evaluating your company as much as you're evaluating them. If no one on your team can articulate a compelling answer to 'why should I join?', you will consistently lose to companies that can.
Share your requirement and get a pre-qualified shortlist in 14 days. Success fee only.
Submit Hiring Requirement →